Kirkuk uzerine bir makale de Rurter dan-

HeK · 22.08.2008 · 2 görüntülenme

Reuter, 20.08.08
By Missy Ryan

ARBIL, Iraq (Reuters) - Iraqi politicians must not let a bitter feud over the oil-rich city of Kirkuk stand in the way of provincial elections expected to redraw the country's political map, the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad said on Wednesday.

"It's important that the elections law focus on elections, not on attempting to use this legislation to solve a difficult and much more complicated problem," Ryan Crocker, Washington's ambassador to Iraq, told Reuters in the Kurdish capital Arbil.

Earlier this month, Iraq's parliament failed to pass a draft law needed to hold the provincial polls after politicians reached deadlock over how the vote might alter the balance of power in the ethnically mixed northern city.

Washington had been urging Iraqi politicians to shelve the feud over Kirkuk, which minority Kurds want to fold into their autonomous northern region over the fierce objections of Kirkuk's Turkmen and Arab residents.

The fate of Kirkuk threatens to force a serious delay in the long-awaited polls, originally scheduled for October 1, and poses a major political test for Iraq's fledgling democracy.

Both the United States and the United Nations hope the elections will foster reconciliation after five years of bloodshed and give a greater voice to the Sunni and Shi'ite

factions that stayed away from previous polls.

An earlier version of the law was vetoed by President Jalal Talabani, himself a Kurd, and sent back to parliament.

Crocker, speaking at an economic forum in Arbil, told officials from different ethnic and political blocs that they must do more to bridge partisan and sectarian divisions.

"You have faced and suffered from common enemies," Crocker said, such as former leader Saddam Hussein and Sunni al Qaeda militants who have targeted Iraqis of all stripes.

"It is very important to remember what brings you together, not only the differences," he said.

He said a plan brokered by the United Nations, which would have allowed the local polls to go ahead across Iraq, except in Kirkuk, whose fate would be dealt with in a separate law later on, "seems to be the way to proceed".

But so far, the plan has yet to produce any definitive consensus surrounding the Kirkuk tinderbox.

SCANT SIGNS OF PROGRESS

Deputy Prime Minister Rafie al-Esawi, from the Sunni Accordance Front, told reporters after the conference that politicians were still seeking a solution to the impasse.

Some fear tensions will fester, triggering renewed strife just as violence in Iraq falls to levels not seen since 2004.

The Kirkuk issue has prompted protests, including one in which more than 20 people were killed in a suicide attack.

In Baghdad, U.N. officials on Wednesday unveiled a new plan for resolving territorial disputes in Iraq, proposing for Kirkuk a broad political deal backed by all sides, which would be put to a "confirmatory referendum".

Kirkuk Governor Abdul Rahman Mustafa, a Kurd, downplayed tensions among the city's diverse population and rejected the idea that the elections impasse could ignite new violence.

"No, no," he told Reuters. "We are like brothers with each other."

İlgili

Yorumlar (1)

HeK · 18 yıl önce

bastan soyluyeyim yanilma olasilginin yuksek oldugu mevzuda yorum yapiyoruz. usa ambasadorunun erbil de verdigi demecin ilk bolumu ilginc. fokus orya. yaklasan secimlerin sadec secim meselesine fokuslanmasinin dogru olacagini. secim yasai ile baska ciddi problemleri (o acitan soylemese de kasdettigi Kirkuk) karistirmamak gerektigini belirtiyor. bu kurd itirazlarinin USA ca kabulenildigi anlamina gelir. yanliz bu ayni zamqanda kurdlere bir parmak bal taddirmak anlamina da gelebilir. USA ne planliyorsa bu onlarin adimi ve plani burda belirleyici olan kurdlerin CYAYDIRICILIK larini hem kaliteli hem nicelikli hale getirmeleri. su ana kadar elde var bol bol barzani demecleri (eger kapali kapilar ardindan benzeri sinyaller veriliyorsa amenna) ve sadece bir kac gosteri. kucumsemiyorum ama mesele devam ettigi surece gosteri ve tepkilerin de devam etmesi gerekir. ehh bu arada PKK tosuncuklar da kandil ve mucavir alanlarda uc besy koyun ahalisinikerkuk icin yurutmusler. yahu bunlar asil sorumluluk alanlarinin kuzey oldugunu ve kuzeyde kerkuk sentimentinin neredeyse pkk cevrelerinde olu bir cenin halinde birakildigini DTP nin de su gunlerde torklarin kicini yalama listelerine en absurd cikislarindan birini yapmakla olimpiyatlarda tork basarisizligini meclise tasimakla mesgul olduklarini biri bunlara hatirlatsa. boyle bir essekligi birakin kurdleri torklar bile yapmis olsa dunya aleme rezil olmak icin yeterdi- simdi dunya demez mi bu ne bicim millet onca problem arasinda bir meclise en olmadik mevzuyu tasiyan yarrabim varsan eger bize sabir bu DTP lilere de azicik akil-izan -kultur-anlayis-kavrayis ver azicik azicik! (tabii bur arada kestirmeden kurtulmacilar pkk= ergenekon urunu deyip, onlardan bir beklenti icinde olmanin absurd oldugundan dem vuracaklar. hayat bu kadar basit denklemlerle aciklansaydi einstein bu kadar meshur olmazdi. ne demek mi istiyorum? vallahi onu aciklamaya vaktim yok-bir baskasi kendine gore yapiversin) neseli ve saglikli gunler HeK

Hanife · 18 yıl önce

Sevgili HeK, Dogrusu Ryan Cocker'in sadece secime yonlenilmesi tavsiyesini ben senin kadar iyi niyetli yorumlamadim. Bana gore Kurdlere biz secimlere odaklanalim, Kerkuk sorununu yine erteleyelim diyor. Halbuki benim tavsiyelerimden biri, Kerkuk konusunda Kurdlerin istedigi bir noktaya gelinceye kadar tum secim yasasini rehin almak. Crocker' iste bunu istemiyor. Olayi dah iyi kavramak icin yeni secim yasasina neden taraflarin onem verdigini acalim biraz. ABD icin bu secimle son secimleri protestoo eden Sunniler hukumete resmi olarak ortak olacaklar. Biliyorsun bir cok Sunni lider ABD yaninda yer aldi ve Irak'daki siddetin azalmasinda onemli rol oynadilar. Yani ABD gecikme olursa Sunni liderlerin destegini kaybetmekten korkuyor. Sunnilerin secimle girmemesi Kurdlere ne kadar fazladan bir guc verdi parlamentoda? Benim cok fazla bilgimin olmadigi nokta iste burasi. Eger secimler yapiplip da Kurdler bugunku guclerini kaybederlerse Kerkuk konusunda oldu bittiye getirilebilirler. O yuzden ben tum secimleri engellemenin dogru olacagini ve guclu oldugumuz bu donemde Kerkuk konusunda bizim lehimize bir karar cikmasinin dogru olacagini dusunuyorum. Yanlis mi dusunuyorum? Sevgiler, Hanife